Nelson A. Denis' War Against All Puerto Ricans: An Informal Review

-

Author’s Note: Feeling sort of better since I wrote this. It’s a process! But wanted to get it out there as a signal that I’m still alive and kicking.

Been feeling mentally unwell lately. Social isolation, emotional withdrawal, boredom. You know the hierarchy of needs. Without the middle part of the pyramid, you’re not going to get the top part. No elf game fun. Started reading again to stimulate my brain and also because I accumulated a tall stack of books since my last spree. Picked War Against All Puerto Ricans for starters, a critical history of the American occupation of Puerto Rico by Nelson Antonio Denis.

It was a quicker read than I expected, but nevertheless full of research never before compiled (including, surprisingly, primary-source material from elderly boricuas or their families). Denis divided the book into three parts: historical context of the early/mid twentieth century; biographies of significant figures during that time; and the unfolding of the national revolution and its repression. Each section complements the others by framing the raw facts and chronology with the lives of individuals who, although major players, also exemplified the subjective experience of Puerto Ricans in general: the sugarcane workers, the urban folk, the intelligentsia. It’s a good book whether you’ve heard before about the Ponce Massacre or the mass sterilization of 34% of Puerto Rican women, both executed by the US.

It was especially useful to read in light of J. Sakai’s Settlers, as a crash course on one American colony’s history to see how the US treated racialized workers and their political dissent at the same time that it was courting white workers to fall in line with the ethnonationalist capitalist empire. A reminder that liberalism and fascism are not useful categories of material analysis since liberal states and fascist states end up doing the same things for the same reasons (except for a dubious notion that one is externally targeted and the other is internal). Also helps me better understand my grandparents’ experiences which they avoided talking about, for good reason. My grandfather cut sugarcane in his youth; didn’t know that virtually all sugarcane plantations were American-owned. Stuff like that.

Wish I had more to say. Brain’s probably cooked, still. Good book, upsetting to read in many parts on account of the American occupiers’ severe cruelty. Are you going to let that stop you? Anyway. What else. I’m baking red velvet cookies for Valentine’s Day, and will share the recipe if people like them. Going to have a nice trip the day of. Planned it myself for my partner and I, and the part of my brain that works is excited. Made a good tikka masala. My little baby boy cat Rainbow turned 1 year old. Walked 1.5 hours home after getting scammed at a mechanic shop and missing my bus ride while my phone was at 5%. Got catcalled. Bought fancy tequila.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plagiarism in Unconquered (2022)

-
Image
Ultimately [UVG2E], like UVG1E, are books [sic] that long to be cut to pieces, chopped & screwed and re-arranged and re-organized and repurposed into the collected loose-leaf notes of a GM binder, to be pulled out and smoothly interjected into a Something Else. Noora Rose, “ UVG, UVG2E, and Me ” (2023-06-30) I was originally going to put this post (at least, the commentary parts) through an AI Gary Gygax translator and publish it on a friend's burner blog. However, this is too serious to be treated like a joke, so here it is instead. Staking my name on it, lol. A Something Else Unconquered (2022) is an OSR-style science-fantasy adventure game and setting by Noora Rose of Monkey's Paw Games. Originally intended to have been based on Knave , according to the 2020 Kickstarter campaign , Rose refactored it to be based on Into the Odd instead—although with significant influence from Jared Sinclair's The Vanilla Game . I previously threw Unconquered into my big OSR
Read more

OSR Rules Families

-
Image
So, here’s the thing: originally I wrote this like a fucking research article with a hypothesis, a methodology, and all that stuff. I’m not even a scientific research person. That’s my partner’s job. Not mine. So, instead of walking you through every single step I took, I’m going to take the journalistic approach and start with the big picture before I zoom into it and tell you about the little details. I read, reviewed, and statistically organized 38 different rulebooks considered to be OSR or OSR-adjacent. These include four rulebooks from TSR-era Dungeons & Dragons , as well as ten rulebooks from the 2000s and 2010s. The remaining 24 rulebooks postdate the closure of G+ in early 2019. Please refer to the bibliography at the bottom of this post for more information. After having collected and organized a dataset with ~90 variables, I found the statistical similarity between each pair of rulebooks based on that data. Finally, I ran an algorithm to determine clusters of these bo
Read more

D&D Fifth Edition: Death & Rebirth

-
Image
Hashtag OSRisOverParty, Hashtag RIPBozo, etc etc. The initial… “edition” of Dungeons & Dragons, Fifth Edition tried to present itself as a reactionary return to some ideal past paradigm of D&D —be it Third Edition to win back territory lost prior to Paizo’s Pathfinder , or an even older Gygaxian edition to get in the pants of the sort-of nascent OSR. Practically, this resulted in a final product that was like a simple Third Edition with dogwhistle-like nods to OSR conventions (since the play-style’s influence in the end was tenuous at best and mostly abandoned after the public test phase). It’s maybe more succinctly described as a people-pleasing game, with the caveat that people-pleasers don’t please anyone. So, how did it become popular? And how does the new 2024 not-edition reflect major differences between then and now, in terms of how D&D is perceived and played? This is my ramble. Sent from iPhone. Fifth Edition: Born in 2014 Of course, nobody plays D&D as
Read more