FMC Basic: Final Fighters Revision

-

JWMillwright left this really cool comment on my previous post about fighters:

I’ve more or less adopted these rules but allow Fighters to use this bonus as one of the following; to-hit bonus, a damage bonus, or make an extra attack with no bonus.

And only now something just clicked: it should be really simple to introduce the same framework as simple skirmishes if you just allow fighters to split their bonus between multiple attacks (if their bonus is +2 or greater). So I've removed the rule that fighters attack until they miss, and replaced it with fighters being able to split or combine their attack bonus into multiple small attacks or one big attack. Monsters can now also do the same thing. This increases the continuity between FMC Basic and FMC proper, so it really feels like a simplified version of how I run the latter.

You could give experts +1 prowess every second level and mages every third level, but that feels more appropriate for how I run FMC proper where hit dice translate directly into combat capability. You could also remove classes altogether, and allow characters to gain 1 prowess, energy, or skill each level. Options!

Also check out this really cool thread by James Palmer about the development of D&D into a social/psychodramatic game. Really resonant with how I've played Fifth Edition or seen it played.

Comments

  1. JWMillwrightDecember 21, 2023 at 11:38 AM

    This is pretty fantastic! Would you keep the +1 damage to attack per prowess from the linked article?

    ReplyDelete
  2. hdpDecember 25, 2023 at 8:02 PM

    "You could also remove classes altogether, and allow characters to gain 1 prowess, energy, or skill each level."

    Or strip the classes down to the bare bones and allow each of them to do something special with prowess, energy, or skills.

    Fighter: attack multiple enemies w/ prowess
    Expert: extra skill
    Mage: maleficence

    but also then

    Elf: trade between prowess and energy every morning

    or drawing from more modern sources,

    Bard: while playing an instrument, may cast (choose two) charm, dispel, empathize, hasten, heal, or lullaby as from a scroll (spend energy)
    Ranger: animal companion with prowess and HP equal to yours / 2
    Warlock: maleficence, may cast (choose two) charm, metamorphose, float, reveal, or shroud without a scroll (spend energy), don't upset your patron

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plagiarism in Unconquered (2022)

-
Image
Ultimately [UVG2E], like UVG1E, are books [sic] that long to be cut to pieces, chopped & screwed and re-arranged and re-organized and repurposed into the collected loose-leaf notes of a GM binder, to be pulled out and smoothly interjected into a Something Else. Noora Rose, “ UVG, UVG2E, and Me ” (2023-06-30) I was originally going to put this post (at least, the commentary parts) through an AI Gary Gygax translator and publish it on a friend's burner blog. However, this is too serious to be treated like a joke, so here it is instead. Staking my name on it, lol. A Something Else Unconquered (2022) is an OSR-style science-fantasy adventure game and setting by Noora Rose of Monkey's Paw Games. Originally intended to have been based on Knave , according to the 2020 Kickstarter campaign , Rose refactored it to be based on Into the Odd instead—although with significant influence from Jared Sinclair's The Vanilla Game . I previously threw Unconquered into my big OSR
Read more

OSR Rules Families

-
Image
So, here’s the thing: originally I wrote this like a fucking research article with a hypothesis, a methodology, and all that stuff. I’m not even a scientific research person. That’s my partner’s job. Not mine. So, instead of walking you through every single step I took, I’m going to take the journalistic approach and start with the big picture before I zoom into it and tell you about the little details. I read, reviewed, and statistically organized 38 different rulebooks considered to be OSR or OSR-adjacent. These include four rulebooks from TSR-era Dungeons & Dragons , as well as ten rulebooks from the 2000s and 2010s. The remaining 24 rulebooks postdate the closure of G+ in early 2019. Please refer to the bibliography at the bottom of this post for more information. After having collected and organized a dataset with ~90 variables, I found the statistical similarity between each pair of rulebooks based on that data. Finally, I ran an algorithm to determine clusters of these bo
Read more

D&D Fifth Edition: Death & Rebirth

-
Image
Hashtag OSRisOverParty, Hashtag RIPBozo, etc etc. The initial… “edition” of Dungeons & Dragons, Fifth Edition tried to present itself as a reactionary return to some ideal past paradigm of D&D —be it Third Edition to win back territory lost prior to Paizo’s Pathfinder , or an even older Gygaxian edition to get in the pants of the sort-of nascent OSR. Practically, this resulted in a final product that was like a simple Third Edition with dogwhistle-like nods to OSR conventions (since the play-style’s influence in the end was tenuous at best and mostly abandoned after the public test phase). It’s maybe more succinctly described as a people-pleasing game, with the caveat that people-pleasers don’t please anyone. So, how did it become popular? And how does the new 2024 not-edition reflect major differences between then and now, in terms of how D&D is perceived and played? This is my ramble. Sent from iPhone. Fifth Edition: Born in 2014 Of course, nobody plays D&D as
Read more