Randomly Generated Constant Damage

-

A bit of a mouthful!

I had the thought: why not give each instance of a weapon constant damage, but roll to determine that constant amount? For example, a D6 weapon can deal somewhere from 1 to 6 damage, and one you buy from town might just deal 3 damage. However, if you go adventuring, you might come across special ones that deal even more (or less). Besides reducing the complexity of combat, this also introduces Diablo-style loot where you get just a little meaningful granularity.

Plus, check this: on a roll of 1, you increase the rarity of the item and reroll the weapon die. Each point of rarity could map to +1 of some special type of damage if you want to be basic, or it could be an actually special power that triggers on some condition (like rolling a crit or something).

You would probably want either a D20 master table of weapons or a smaller D6 table specialized for a specific faction or type of opponent (to make it a general loot table, probably use entries 1–3 for weapons and entries 4–6 for random things, so you can halve the die when determining what opps are holding), as well as a D6 table for potential special powers.

I made a master table but I don't really like it because it imposes itself as general while the individual items are, by virtue of that, relatively specific and boring. Have a scarecrow instead:

  1. Spade (D4, piercing, melee) / 1 silver
  2. Scythe (D6, slashing, slashing)  / 1 silver
  3. Sling (D4, bludgeoning, ranged) / 1 silver
  4. N/A
  5. N/A
  6. N/A

Probably, when rolling loot, roll D6 again: if it's the weapon they were wielding, then it survived and it's up for grabs; otherwise, you just get the loot listed.

Might go well with my previous post, though not necessarily.

Comments

  1. niosisApril 10, 2024 at 6:08 AM

    this is really nice! the addition of rolls of 1 introducing special features is particularly good. for weapons of d8 and higher it may make sense to even reroll on 2s for some more mundane bonus. ive been thinking a bit about that diablo style loot recently, you could maybe do like your previous post like you said, but roll the to-hit bonus when the loot is generated too? damage on miss is the only other interesting variable that comes to mind... apart from maybe treasure value? like a gilded sword thats completely blunt? that would only really make sense as a rare chance, compared to tying it to the damage value or plain old item type

    ReplyDelete
  2. GRANApril 30, 2024 at 10:40 AM

    It also means that lower damaging weapons (d4-d6) have higher chances of being magical which is pretty neat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. GRANMay 1, 2024 at 1:40 AM

      Also, I just thought, how would this deal with both PCs natural weapons (say an orc's tusks) and improvised weapons? (say a players ability to consider objects as appropriate weapons) Would they be exceptions?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plagiarism in Unconquered (2022)

-
Image
Ultimately [UVG2E], like UVG1E, are books [sic] that long to be cut to pieces, chopped & screwed and re-arranged and re-organized and repurposed into the collected loose-leaf notes of a GM binder, to be pulled out and smoothly interjected into a Something Else. Noora Rose, “ UVG, UVG2E, and Me ” (2023-06-30) I was originally going to put this post (at least, the commentary parts) through an AI Gary Gygax translator and publish it on a friend's burner blog. However, this is too serious to be treated like a joke, so here it is instead. Staking my name on it, lol. A Something Else Unconquered (2022) is an OSR-style science-fantasy adventure game and setting by Noora Rose of Monkey's Paw Games. Originally intended to have been based on Knave , according to the 2020 Kickstarter campaign , Rose refactored it to be based on Into the Odd instead—although with significant influence from Jared Sinclair's The Vanilla Game . I previously threw Unconquered into my big OSR
Read more

OSR Rules Families

-
Image
So, here’s the thing: originally I wrote this like a fucking research article with a hypothesis, a methodology, and all that stuff. I’m not even a scientific research person. That’s my partner’s job. Not mine. So, instead of walking you through every single step I took, I’m going to take the journalistic approach and start with the big picture before I zoom into it and tell you about the little details. I read, reviewed, and statistically organized 38 different rulebooks considered to be OSR or OSR-adjacent. These include four rulebooks from TSR-era Dungeons & Dragons , as well as ten rulebooks from the 2000s and 2010s. The remaining 24 rulebooks postdate the closure of G+ in early 2019. Please refer to the bibliography at the bottom of this post for more information. After having collected and organized a dataset with ~90 variables, I found the statistical similarity between each pair of rulebooks based on that data. Finally, I ran an algorithm to determine clusters of these bo
Read more

D&D Fifth Edition: Death & Rebirth

-
Image
Hashtag OSRisOverParty, Hashtag RIPBozo, etc etc. The initial… “edition” of Dungeons & Dragons, Fifth Edition tried to present itself as a reactionary return to some ideal past paradigm of D&D —be it Third Edition to win back territory lost prior to Paizo’s Pathfinder , or an even older Gygaxian edition to get in the pants of the sort-of nascent OSR. Practically, this resulted in a final product that was like a simple Third Edition with dogwhistle-like nods to OSR conventions (since the play-style’s influence in the end was tenuous at best and mostly abandoned after the public test phase). It’s maybe more succinctly described as a people-pleasing game, with the caveat that people-pleasers don’t please anyone. So, how did it become popular? And how does the new 2024 not-edition reflect major differences between then and now, in terms of how D&D is perceived and played? This is my ramble. Sent from iPhone. Fifth Edition: Born in 2014 Of course, nobody plays D&D as
Read more