2D6 and Dice Pools
Following Lich Van Winkle's post about dee-five-six, I wanted to post about a realization I had that I'm sure others know but thought would be nice to record: 2D6+X where we take the sum PbtA-style approximates (X+1)D6 where we take the highest roll. Below is a table of result brackets:
Result | Sum of 2D6+X | Highest of (X+1)D6 |
---|---|---|
< | …6 | 1–3 |
= | 7–9 | 4–5 |
> | 10… | 6 |
Below is a table of results with increasing X ∊ [0, 3] for 2D6+X:
2D6+X | < | = | > |
---|---|---|---|
2D6 | 41.7% | 41.7% | 16.7% |
2D6+1 | 27.8% | 44.4% | 27.8% |
2D6+2 | 16.7% | 41.7% | 41.7% |
2D6+3 | 8.33% | 33.3% | 58.3% |
Below is a table of results with increasing X ∊ [0, 3] for (X+1)D6:
(X+1)D6 | < | = | > |
---|---|---|---|
1D6 | 50.0% | 33.3% | 16.7% |
2D6 | 25.0% | 44.4% | 30.6% |
3D6 | 12.5% | 45.4% | 42.1% |
4D6 | 6.26% | 41.9% | 51.8% |
I think this is where we get the BitD and Trophy variations on the original PbtA roll, and I prefer that version because the results feel less obscure? Or just on the basis of pure vibes? I constantly go back and forth between using D20 or D6 pools in my home game, except that D20 feels quintessentially (lowercase) "d&d".
Comments
Post a Comment