Randomly Generated Constant Damage

-

A bit of a mouthful!

I had the thought: why not give each instance of a weapon constant damage, but roll to determine that constant amount? For example, a D6 weapon can deal somewhere from 1 to 6 damage, and one you buy from town might just deal 3 damage. However, if you go adventuring, you might come across special ones that deal even more (or less). Besides reducing the complexity of combat, this also introduces Diablo-style loot where you get just a little meaningful granularity.

Plus, check this: on a roll of 1, you increase the rarity of the item and reroll the weapon die. Each point of rarity could map to +1 of some special type of damage if you want to be basic, or it could be an actually special power that triggers on some condition (like rolling a crit or something).

You would probably want either a D20 master table of weapons or a smaller D6 table specialized for a specific faction or type of opponent (to make it a general loot table, probably use entries 1–3 for weapons and entries 4–6 for random things, so you can halve the die when determining what opps are holding), as well as a D6 table for potential special powers.

I made a master table but I don't really like it because it imposes itself as general while the individual items are, by virtue of that, relatively specific and boring. Have a scarecrow instead:

  1. Spade (D4, piercing, melee) / 1 silver
  2. Scythe (D6, slashing, slashing)  / 1 silver
  3. Sling (D4, bludgeoning, ranged) / 1 silver
  4. N/A
  5. N/A
  6. N/A

Probably, when rolling loot, roll D6 again: if it's the weapon they were wielding, then it survived and it's up for grabs; otherwise, you just get the loot listed.

Might go well with my previous post, though not necessarily.

Comments

  1. niosisApril 10, 2024 at 6:08 AM

    this is really nice! the addition of rolls of 1 introducing special features is particularly good. for weapons of d8 and higher it may make sense to even reroll on 2s for some more mundane bonus. ive been thinking a bit about that diablo style loot recently, you could maybe do like your previous post like you said, but roll the to-hit bonus when the loot is generated too? damage on miss is the only other interesting variable that comes to mind... apart from maybe treasure value? like a gilded sword thats completely blunt? that would only really make sense as a rare chance, compared to tying it to the damage value or plain old item type

    ReplyDelete
  2. GRANApril 30, 2024 at 10:40 AM

    It also means that lower damaging weapons (d4-d6) have higher chances of being magical which is pretty neat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. GRANMay 1, 2024 at 1:40 AM

      Also, I just thought, how would this deal with both PCs natural weapons (say an orc's tusks) and improvised weapons? (say a players ability to consider objects as appropriate weapons) Would they be exceptions?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

D&D Fifth Edition: Death & Rebirth

-
Image
Hashtag OSRisOverParty, Hashtag RIPBozo, etc etc. The initial… “edition” of Dungeons & Dragons, Fifth Edition tried to present itself as a reactionary return to some ideal past paradigm of D&D —be it Third Edition to win back territory lost prior to Paizo’s Pathfinder , or an even older Gygaxian edition to get in the pants of the sort-of nascent OSR. Practically, this resulted in a final product that was like a simple Third Edition with dogwhistle-like nods to OSR conventions (since the play-style’s influence in the end was tenuous at best and mostly abandoned after the public test phase). It’s maybe more succinctly described as a people-pleasing game, with the caveat that people-pleasers don’t please anyone. So, how did it become popular? And how does the new 2024 not-edition reflect major differences between then and now, in terms of how D&D is perceived and played? This is my ramble. Sent from iPhone. Fifth Edition: Born in 2014 Of course, nobody plays D&D as ...
Read more

OSR Rules Families

-
Image
So, here’s the thing: originally I wrote this like a fucking research article with a hypothesis, a methodology, and all that stuff. I’m not even a scientific research person. That’s my partner’s job. Not mine. So, instead of walking you through every single step I took, I’m going to take the journalistic approach and start with the big picture before I zoom into it and tell you about the little details. I read, reviewed, and statistically organized 38 different rulebooks considered to be OSR or OSR-adjacent. These include four rulebooks from TSR-era Dungeons & Dragons , as well as ten rulebooks from the 2000s and 2010s. The remaining 24 rulebooks postdate the closure of G+ in early 2019. Please refer to the bibliography at the bottom of this post for more information. After having collected and organized a dataset with ~90 variables, I found the statistical similarity between each pair of rulebooks based on that data. Finally, I ran an algorithm to determine clusters of these bo...
Read more

Bite-Sized Dungeons

-
Image
Workbook Now Available On Itch! Bite-Sized Dungeons by Traverse Fantasy Edit: This whole time, I said that a first level dungeon hoard had 100 times d6 gold pieces when it actually has just 10 times d6. This means the average hoard has an XP value of 70 without gems, or ~110 with gems. By extension, the eighteen-room dungeon only has 350 XP without gems, or ~550 XP with gems. That is downright dismal and I don’t think works out with modern play sessions and party counts, so let’s pretend it said 100 times d6 anyway. I just read an article by Yora of Spriggan’s Den about extrapolating a scheme for an eighteen-room dungeon from the procedural generation rules in B/X (1981) [1]. As Yora points out, eighteen rooms is a great size for a mid-to-large dungeon or for a floor of a multi-level dungeon, and the checklist of rooms makes it easy to make sure that the final product has a variety of interesting play interactions. But, being as large as it is, it can still be a tall order on the ...
Read more