Converting HD to Hits-To-Kill

-

I had a suspicion the other day that HD 1 figures are more like HD 2 figures than HD ½ figures in terms of longevity since it will usually take at least 2 hits to defeat both (since HD 1, half the time, will have more hit points than damage dealt by a single attack). Simulated this and it turned out to be more-or-less true!

Hit Dice Turns to Defeat Hits to Defeat Relative to HD ½ Relative to HD 1
½d 2.37 1.16 100% 74%
1d–1 2.75 1.37 118% 87%
1d 3.22 1.58 136% 100%
1d+1 3.71 1.85
 159% 117%
2d 5.01 2.51
 216% 159%
4d 8.91 4.47
 385% 283%
6d 12.9 6.49
 559% 411%
8d 16.9 8.47
 730% 537%
10d 20.9 10.4
 897% 659%
12d 25.0 12.5
 1078% 793%

This effect is due to the Packing Problem, the effect of which Delta's D&D Hotspot also discusses on sweeping attacks: figures with less hit points "waste" overflow damage, whereas figures with more hit points soak the full force of the attack. This means that one attack is worth "more" against a higher-HD figure than one with lower HD.

This means that, when converting from hit dice to hits-to-kill, you might not want to use the same value 1:1 for lower-HD figures since HD 1 does not necessarily mean 1 hit-to-kill unless you round down. You might consider that monster 2 hits-to-kill instead, if it seems more appropriate. On the other hand, for HD greater than 1, the value is more or less equal to hits-to-kill.

Comments

  1. Jack TremainJanuary 30, 2024 at 3:53 PM

    I also moved to HD = Hits to kill and stumbled with this problem. It makes certain monsters a little weaker, but its OK in my opinion because at low levels it gives players a little inch of advantage. Why does your blog not have an index by month/year? Im having a rough time reading it and its a pity because Im liking it a lot. Consider putting one. Cheers!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Marcia B.January 30, 2024 at 5:10 PM

      hello and thank you for reading! the archive widget available for this theme (under "old posts" on the side-bar) groups posts by month and year, although it doesn't display individual posts in list format like the old blogger theme does. will see if it's an option!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

D&D Fifth Edition: Death & Rebirth

-
Image
Hashtag OSRisOverParty, Hashtag RIPBozo, etc etc. The initial… “edition” of Dungeons & Dragons, Fifth Edition tried to present itself as a reactionary return to some ideal past paradigm of D&D —be it Third Edition to win back territory lost prior to Paizo’s Pathfinder , or an even older Gygaxian edition to get in the pants of the sort-of nascent OSR. Practically, this resulted in a final product that was like a simple Third Edition with dogwhistle-like nods to OSR conventions (since the play-style’s influence in the end was tenuous at best and mostly abandoned after the public test phase). It’s maybe more succinctly described as a people-pleasing game, with the caveat that people-pleasers don’t please anyone. So, how did it become popular? And how does the new 2024 not-edition reflect major differences between then and now, in terms of how D&D is perceived and played? This is my ramble. Sent from iPhone. Fifth Edition: Born in 2014 Of course, nobody plays D&D as ...
Read more

OSR Rules Families

-
Image
So, here’s the thing: originally I wrote this like a fucking research article with a hypothesis, a methodology, and all that stuff. I’m not even a scientific research person. That’s my partner’s job. Not mine. So, instead of walking you through every single step I took, I’m going to take the journalistic approach and start with the big picture before I zoom into it and tell you about the little details. I read, reviewed, and statistically organized 38 different rulebooks considered to be OSR or OSR-adjacent. These include four rulebooks from TSR-era Dungeons & Dragons , as well as ten rulebooks from the 2000s and 2010s. The remaining 24 rulebooks postdate the closure of G+ in early 2019. Please refer to the bibliography at the bottom of this post for more information. After having collected and organized a dataset with ~90 variables, I found the statistical similarity between each pair of rulebooks based on that data. Finally, I ran an algorithm to determine clusters of these bo...
Read more

Bite-Sized Dungeons

-
Image
Workbook Now Available On Itch! Bite-Sized Dungeons by Traverse Fantasy Edit: This whole time, I said that a first level dungeon hoard had 100 times d6 gold pieces when it actually has just 10 times d6. This means the average hoard has an XP value of 70 without gems, or ~110 with gems. By extension, the eighteen-room dungeon only has 350 XP without gems, or ~550 XP with gems. That is downright dismal and I don’t think works out with modern play sessions and party counts, so let’s pretend it said 100 times d6 anyway. I just read an article by Yora of Spriggan’s Den about extrapolating a scheme for an eighteen-room dungeon from the procedural generation rules in B/X (1981) [1]. As Yora points out, eighteen rooms is a great size for a mid-to-large dungeon or for a floor of a multi-level dungeon, and the checklist of rooms makes it easy to make sure that the final product has a variety of interesting play interactions. But, being as large as it is, it can still be a tall order on the ...
Read more