Assistance Advantage

-

Just a thought, while thinking about how assisted checks work in Fifth Edition: gaining advantage from assistance should take the lowest of the two characters’ bonuses, not the highest.

Using this new math, an assisted check with +0 is generally as capable as a non-assisted check with +4 (not without some nuance); though the +4 character succeeds more often with higher target numbers, while the +0 pair of characters succeeds (slightly) more with lower difficulty classes. This could represent a tradeoff between consistent, aggregate effort or raw individual ability.

Reasons why I think this would work well:

  • It is for weaker characters’ benefit to seek help at tasks they otherwise could not do.
  • It may prove more difficult for stronger characters to accept help than to do something themselves; if their bonus is +4 greater than their potential helper, they would not benefit from the help.
  • To optimize chances of success, strong characters should work together to get the highest possible roll. This facilitates the “worker placement” aspect of allocating tasks to different characters.

I don’t really have much else to say about this except that I think it’s fun when characters help each other and if they could get little friendship points for fun because of it, that would be cute but tedious. Or if your character’s relationship could improve the assistance somehow, like if you spend downtime together like in Miitopia. But that’s all kinda extra, so I’ll just leave this post at that.

As an alternative and potential middle ground, just let both characters roll. Rolling with advantage is already the same thing as getting two tries, it's just not phrased as such; so why not lean into that?

Comments

  1. Roger G-SMarch 28, 2023 at 7:09 AM

    The "advantage" solution is one I am inclined to do at times - maybe treating it as a third "super-advantage" die in cases where they already have advantage.
    Or, add the ability bonus or proficiency bonus, whichever is higher, of the helper to the helpee's roll; which more convincingly "stacks" against both ad and disad.

    ReplyDelete
  2. JoshMarch 28, 2023 at 7:21 AM

    "Have both players roll" seems particularly appealing, but there's something fuzzy about how many people can help at once - when you have one of those situations where the entire team could help, your chances of failure usually disappear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Marcia B.March 28, 2023 at 2:34 PM

      for sure! i'd imagine one would still keep the rule that only two people can help at a task that otherwise would take just one person to resolve, otherwise it's a too many chefs in the kitchen kind of thing :) at the same time, the number of successes required could be a variable thing in itself -- though then you're into skill challenge territory haha

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

D&D Fifth Edition: Death & Rebirth

-
Image
Hashtag OSRisOverParty, Hashtag RIPBozo, etc etc. The initial… “edition” of Dungeons & Dragons, Fifth Edition tried to present itself as a reactionary return to some ideal past paradigm of D&D —be it Third Edition to win back territory lost prior to Paizo’s Pathfinder , or an even older Gygaxian edition to get in the pants of the sort-of nascent OSR. Practically, this resulted in a final product that was like a simple Third Edition with dogwhistle-like nods to OSR conventions (since the play-style’s influence in the end was tenuous at best and mostly abandoned after the public test phase). It’s maybe more succinctly described as a people-pleasing game, with the caveat that people-pleasers don’t please anyone. So, how did it become popular? And how does the new 2024 not-edition reflect major differences between then and now, in terms of how D&D is perceived and played? This is my ramble. Sent from iPhone. Fifth Edition: Born in 2014 Of course, nobody plays D&D as ...
Read more

OSR Rules Families

-
Image
So, here’s the thing: originally I wrote this like a fucking research article with a hypothesis, a methodology, and all that stuff. I’m not even a scientific research person. That’s my partner’s job. Not mine. So, instead of walking you through every single step I took, I’m going to take the journalistic approach and start with the big picture before I zoom into it and tell you about the little details. I read, reviewed, and statistically organized 38 different rulebooks considered to be OSR or OSR-adjacent. These include four rulebooks from TSR-era Dungeons & Dragons , as well as ten rulebooks from the 2000s and 2010s. The remaining 24 rulebooks postdate the closure of G+ in early 2019. Please refer to the bibliography at the bottom of this post for more information. After having collected and organized a dataset with ~90 variables, I found the statistical similarity between each pair of rulebooks based on that data. Finally, I ran an algorithm to determine clusters of these bo...
Read more

Bite-Sized Dungeons

-
Image
Workbook Now Available On Itch! Bite-Sized Dungeons by Traverse Fantasy Edit: This whole time, I said that a first level dungeon hoard had 100 times d6 gold pieces when it actually has just 10 times d6. This means the average hoard has an XP value of 70 without gems, or ~110 with gems. By extension, the eighteen-room dungeon only has 350 XP without gems, or ~550 XP with gems. That is downright dismal and I don’t think works out with modern play sessions and party counts, so let’s pretend it said 100 times d6 anyway. I just read an article by Yora of Spriggan’s Den about extrapolating a scheme for an eighteen-room dungeon from the procedural generation rules in B/X (1981) [1]. As Yora points out, eighteen rooms is a great size for a mid-to-large dungeon or for a floor of a multi-level dungeon, and the checklist of rooms makes it easy to make sure that the final product has a variety of interesting play interactions. But, being as large as it is, it can still be a tall order on the ...
Read more